In this study, I examined the 『History of Korean Literature』 which was written by Yoon Yoonjin and Others. Though it is not a formal history of Korean literature, this book can be a touchstone to confirm how they are teaching korean language and literature in China nowadays. The results are as follows; 1. The whole structure of this book is in confusion because the criterion of periodization is too obscure. So there should be a definite consideration about it. 2. In the literature of ancient times, there are no description about myths of Hyuk-geo-se(혁거세), Tal-hae (탈해), Ga-rak-guk(가락국), and Tam-ra-guk(탐라국). So the whole distribution and context of it could not be clarified appropriately. 3. It is necessary to put a viewpoint in order about the limits and sphere of literary history, Because the literature of Bal-hae(발해) is excluded. 4. In the old poetry of Go-ryo(고려), several important works of Go-ryo Hyang-ga are omitted such as 〈Bo-hyun-si-won-ga(보현시원가)〉, 〈Do-i-jang-ga(도이장가)〉, and 〈Jeong-gwa-jeong(정과정)〉. 5. There are many mistakes in understanding the history of old novel. For example, 〈Im-jin-nok(임진록)〉 is regarded as the first novel written in Korean alphabet without any evidence.